Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, Xiaoxia
dc.contributor.authorGurarie, David
dc.contributor.authorMungai, Peter L
dc.contributor.authorMuchiri, Eric M
dc.contributor.authorKitron, Uriel
dc.contributor.authorKing, Charles H
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T06:50:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-07T10:46:07Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T06:50:03Z
dc.date.available2020-02-07T10:46:07Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.must.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1422
dc.description.abstractSchistosomiasis remains a significant health burden in many areas of the world. Morbidity control, focused on limiting infection intensity through periodic delivery of anti-schistosomal medicines, is the thrust of current World Health Organization guidelines (2006) for reduction of Schistosoma -related disease. A new appreciation of the lifetime impact of repeated Schistosoma infection has directed attention toward strategies for greater suppression of parasite infection per se,with the goal of transmission interruption. Variations in drug schedules involving increased population coverage and/or treatment frequency are now undergoing field trials. However, their relative effectiveness in long-term infection suppression is presently unknown. Our study used available field data to calibrate advanced network models of village-level Schistosoma transmission to project outcomes of six different community- or school age-based programs, as compared to the impact of current 2006 W.H.O. recommended control strategies. We then scored the number of years each of 10 typical villages would remain below 10% infection prevalence (a practicable level associated with minimal prevalence of disease). All strategies that included four annual treatments effectively reduced community prevalence to less than 10%, while programs having yearly gaps (‘holidays’) failed to reach this objective in half of the communities. Effective post-program suppression of infection prevalence persisted in half of the 10 villages for 7–10 years, whereas in five high-risk villages, program effects on prevalence lasted zero to four years only.At typical levels of treatment adherence (60 to 70%), current WHO recommendations will likely not achieve effective suppression of Schistosoma prevalence unless implemented for $ 6 years. Following more aggressive 4 year annual intervention, some communities may be able to continue without further intervention for 8–10 years, while in higher-risk communities, annual treatment may prove necessary until eco-social factors fostering transmission are removed. Effective ongoing surveillance and locally targeted annual intervention must then become their mainstays of control.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSchistosomiasisen_US
dc.titleProjecting the long-term impact of school-or community-based mass-treatment interventions for control of Schistosoma infectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record